Treasury not considering cutting thresholds for higher rates of income tax, sources say
This is from Pippa Crerar, the Guardian’s political editor, on where we stand this morning after all the fallout from the budget income tax U-turn. She confirms that sources are now ruling out cutting the thresholds for paying higher rates of income tax.
She says government insiders claim the change is all down to better-than-expected fiscal forecasts, and that Labour opposition to the proposal was not a factor.
Where we are on budget after revelation Rachel Reeves will no longer hike income tax rates
– Treasury confirms that stronger than expected OBR forecasts means fiscal gap is closer to £20bn than previously speculated £30-£40bn. Reeves also wants headroom of around £15bn in addition.
– This means Reeves does not need to become first chancellor in 50 years to raise basic rate on income tax – breaching a central manifesto promise.
– Improved forecasts are result of stronger wage growth (and therefore higher tax receipts) which started to feed into figures last week.
– But £20bn is still big number – so expect income tax thresholds to be frozen for another two years, taxes on salary sacrifice schemes, fuel duty equivalent for electric vehicles – plus ‘smorgasbord’ of other measures.
– As per previous post, I’m told that income tax thresholds will not be cut, despite speculation.
– Govt insiders say decision to drop income tax plan is nothing to do with political fall-out after Reeves publicly signalled manifesto breach – causing huge anxiety among Labour MPs (which ultimately fed into No 10’s extraordinary attempts to shore up PM).
– They defend decision to ‘roll the pitch’ on income tax rises – saying at that point they thought it might be necessary and leaving it to just before budget would’ve spooked MPs and markets.
Share
Key events
Show key events only
Please turn on JavaScript to use this feature
The leftwing Labour MP Richard Burgon has welcomed the news that Rachel Reeves won’t raise income tax in the budget.
Raising income taxes on working people would’ve been totally wrong – so it’s good if that’s been dropped.
Here’s 3 fairer alternatives:
A Wealth Tax of 2% on assets over £10m → £24bn/yr
Equalising capital gains & income tax → £12bn/yr
Windfall Tax on banks → £14bn/yr
Share
There were five council byelections yesterday. Election Maps UK have the results.
The Greens held one seat, and gained another, from the Lib Dems.
Long Ashton (North Somerset) Council By-Election Result:
🌍 GRN: 55.7% (+25.1)
🌳 CON: 17.7% (-7.2)
➡️ RFM: 15.5% (New)
🔶 LDM: 5.7% (-28.8)
🌹 LAB: 5.4% (-4.5)
Green HOLD.
Changes w/ 2023.
— Election Maps UK (@ElectionMapsUK) November 14, 2025
Wincheap (Canterbury) Council By-Election Result:
🌍 GRN: 39.1% (+24.1)
🔶 LDM: 24.1% (-12.2)
➡️ RFM: 16.3% (New)
🌹 LAB: 12.8% (-25.5)
🌳 CON: 7.7% (-2.6)
Green GAIN from Liberal Democrat.
Changes w/ 2023.
— Election Maps UK (@ElectionMapsUK) November 14, 2025
Commenting on these results, Zack Polanski, the Green party leader, said:
People have tried to say that the Green surge is just on social media.
Or in a bubble that’s just about polls and just about new members.
Yet up and down the country – Greens are also winning elections.
Huge congratulations to Canterbury Greens!
Reform UK gained one seat from the Conservatives.
Chapel St Leonard’s (East Lindsey) Council By-Election Result:
➡️ RFM: 65.8% (New)
🌳 CON: 15.6% (-20.7)
🙋 Ind: 6.7% (New)
🌹 LAB: 5.4% (-27.7)
🔶 LDM: 4.7% (New)
🙋 Ind: 1.7% (New)
No Ind (-30.5) as previous.
Reform GAIN from Conservative.
Changes w/ 2023.
— Election Maps UK (@ElectionMapsUK) November 14, 2025
Election Maps UK says this is the highest Reform vote share in any election ever.
The Lib Dems held one seat.
Ridgeway (Vale of White Horse) Council By-Election Result:
🔶 LDM: 43.1% (-15.0)
🌳 CON: 24.4% (-17.6)
➡️ RFM: 19.9% (New)
🌍 GRN: 11.9% (New)
🌹 LAB: 0.8% (New)
Liberal Democrat HOLD.
Changes w/ 2023.
— Election Maps UK (@ElectionMapsUK) November 14, 2025
And Plaid Cymru held one seat.
Bethel a’r Felinheli (Gwynedd) Council By-Election Result:
🌼 PLC: 59.2% (-25.0)
🙋 Ind: 33.2% (New)
➡️ RFM: 6.8% (New)
🌳 CON: 0.8% (New)
No LDM (-15.8) as previous.
Plaid Cymru HOLD.
Changes w/ 2022.
— Election Maps UK (@ElectionMapsUK) November 14, 2025
Share
According to Ben Riley-Smith and Daniel Martin in the Telegraph, one reason why Rachel Reeves abandoned her plan to raise income tax in the budget was because she was told it would raise less money than expected. In their story, they say that the plan to raise income tax by 2p in the pound, offset by a 2p in the pound cut in national insurance, was included in the list of major measures sent to the Office for Budget Responsibility. The policy was supposed to raise £6bn. Riley-Smith and Martin say:
The Treasury included a version of this plan in the major measures submission to the OBR, after which sources say two things changed.
Firstly, the OBR said the move would raise less money than expected. Secondly, there were improvements in other economic metrics.
Wage growth was proving to be stronger than had been expected for months, meaning that the Treasury was getting in more money on that front than had previously been believed, and the black hole in the public finances that Ms Reeves needed to fill was more like £20bn by the end of the decade than the £30bn that was previously feared.
Share
Jeremy Hunt, the former Tory chancellor, has told Times Radio that he thinks there are too many leaks coming out of the Treasury. He said:
There are always some leaks, but it appears that there’s a huge amount of leaks coming from the Treasury. And the Treasury normally has a reputation of being one of the most tight departments. And the budget decisions are kept to a very restricted number of people.
But for some reason, these leaks have been coming out thick and fast. And I think that does make the process feel a lot more chaotic ….
I do think that there is a leakiness now, which is making it difficult. Remember, the whole world is reading this information and they’re looking at British economic decision making. And it looks very chaotic and I don’t think that’s a good thing.
Share
Government sources are briefing (eg here and here) that the Treasury income tax budget U-turn was not related to Keir Starmer’s leadership being under pressure.
But not everyone is convinced. This is what Jim O’Neill, the former Goldman Sachs chief economist who served as a relatively apolitical Treasury minister for a year under David Cameron (in the Lords he’s now a crossbencher) told the World at One about the shift.
When I reflect on it, it’s pretty hard to escape the conclusion that the change of mindset is being done because of the divisions inside the Labour party, which one can get. But, if you are trying to run a country with the tricky challenges that we have, I think you’ve got to be very careful to not send messages to financial markets that you are going to put party consolidation ahead of fiscal credibility.
O’Neill also said that the U-turn made him wonder whether the government had the will to push through difficult decisions. Asked if he thought it had the “steel” needed for further reforms, he replied:
If we would have had this conversation two weeks ago, I would have said to you I think that they have developed the steel. But, looking at some of the other shenanigans going on with briefings in Number 10 and now this, it bothers me.
I hope I will be pleasantly surprised. But if this is how it’s going to go, I’m disappointed and a bit concerned.
Share
If you are looking for some more uplifting political news today, Amy Sedghi is reporting that Larry the Cat will soon be the longest continuous resident of Downing Street since Pitt the Younger. He is also one of the most admired. She has written a lovely piece about him, which is illustrated for her with good video footage too. (Larry v the fox is especially fun – Larry wins.)
Share
Updated at 09.57 EST
In her analysis of the income tax budget U-turn, Beth Rigby from Sky News says that there is anger in Downing Street about the fact that the news leaked last night. She says No 10 did not want the news to come out now and that Keir Starmer had been planning to give a speech on this next week.
Whether or not that speech will still go ahead is not clear.
Share
Government urged to take control of assisted dying bill as peers warned 900-plus amendments could sink it
The assisted dying bill risks running out of time to become law, the Lords has heard amid a record high number of suggested changes to the draft legislation. In its report on the commitee stage debate on the bill in the Lords, PA Media says:
Peers began their first of at least four days of detailed line-by-line scrutiny of the bill which could see assisted dying legalised for terminally ill adults in England and Wales.
More than 900 amendments have been put forward – the highest number ever tabled to a piece of backbench legislation.
The Dignity in Dying group, which campaigns for a change in the law, has warned “the risk of deliberate time-wasting is clear and profoundly unfair”.
But a number of peers told Friday’s debate they can only support bills which are “legislatively fit to be passed”, describing this one as “demonstrably flawed”.
The terminally ill adults (end of life) bill will become law only if both the House of Commons and House of Lords agree on the final drafting of the legislation – with approval needed before spring when the current session of parliament ends.
Gisela Stuart said there are “so many flaws” with the bill in its current form “that I don’t think this house, however long we debate it, can actually get it to a stage where it is legislatively fit to be passed, and that is our role”.
She told her colleagues on the Lords’ red benches: “We should not vote for anything that cannot legislatively be properly implemented.”
Andrew Tyrie said while he is a supporter of the bill’s intentions, it is “demonstrably flawed”.
He suggested the government must take more control of the draft legislation, which is currently proceeding through Parliament as a private member’s bill (PMB).
With less time allocated compared with government legislation, it can be more vulnerable in the face of any delays during the parliamentary process.
Tyrie said: “Surely the government should now be listening. They should now be grasping that they need to take this Bill in themselves … I think attempting to deal with these 900 amendments in this way is going to end up with the bill being talked out.
Former Paralympian Tanni Grey-Thompson urged the government to say what is “going on behind the scenes” to implement assisted dying.
A vocal opponent of the bill, the crossbench peer said she recently met a member of the public in the City of London, who said he was working “full time” on the rollout, adding: “I’m not sure he meant to tell me that.”
She told peers: “I think we do need to understand how many civil servants are currently working on this. Who’s running the Bill team?”
According to the parliamentary authorities, while some bills have had more amendments tabled in total at committee stage, this sets a possible record for the number submitted in the first full list of suggested changes and is almost certainly unprecedented for committee stage of a private member’s bill.
Not all tabled amendments will necessarily be debated as members can choose to withdraw theirs during the process.
The list of all 942 amendments that have been tabled is here. It runs to 234 pages.
Share
The leftwing Labour MP Clive Lewis has welcomed the news that Rachel Reeves won’t raise income tax in the budget. But he is not impressed by her budget strategy.
It’s being trailed in the media that the chancellor won’t, after all, break the manifesto pledge on income tax. If that holds, I welcome it. Breaking the pledge would drive yet another nail into the coffin of political trust. That damage would’ve been worse if a rise came without (still needed) matching action on income from wealth, or on profiteering in energy, food and housing. As I say in this clip from the Daily Politics, what we’re getting now is “a rolling PR campaign with a spreadsheet attached”, not a considered economic or political strategy.
This isn’t an economic strategy. It’s a stream of conflicting press releases held together by a spreadsheet. It doesn’t build confidence & it cracks the Chancellor’s own austerity-driven fiscal rules
So change the rules
Support people, small business & rebuild public services
Share
Badenoch claims BBC employs too many people who are activists, not journalists, and calls for ‘root and branch reform’
In her broadcast clip, Kemi Badenoch said that the BBC was right to apologise to President Trump over the mistake in the way his 6 January 2021 speech was edited for a Panorama documentary and she said she hoped that Trump would drop his threat to sue the corporation over this.
Asked if she would ask Trump to drop his legal action if she were prime minister, Badenoch replied:
If I was prime minister, the BBC would not have got away with putting out a documentary that had fake news in it, so we wouldn’t be in this mess in the first place.
The BBC needs root and branch reform.
I’m glad that the head of news has resigned, but as we have seen with their coverage on the Middle East – it’s not just the coverage with the US, you look at the coverage even on basic issues, like biological fact on sex and gender – the BBC has been a mess.
They have a lot of people there who are not journalists but are activists. They need to be put under control immediately.
Share
Updated at 08.45 EST
