The parliamentary motion to strip former Polish Prime Minister of Justice and Prosecutor General Zbigniew Ziobro of his legal immunity represents a pivotal moment in Poland’s efforts to address alleged institutional abuses committed during the Law and Justice (PiS) administration (2015-2023).
This article analyzes the legal basics and political ramifications of the request, which targets Ziobro for 26 offences, including establishing and leading an organized criminal group, widespread embezzlement from the state-controlled Justice Fund ( Fundusz Sprawiedliwości,) and the unlawful acquisition and deployment of the Pegasus surveillance system.
The proceedings are framed not merely as a criminal investigation but as a central component of the new government’s mandate to restore the rule of law, directly challenging the system politicization of the prosecution and judiciary- a defining feature of Ziobro’s tenure. The case acts as a critical test of accountability for high-ranking political officials and the integrity of democratic institutions in post- PiS Poland.
The Dual Power and Its Legal Challenge
Zbigniew Ziobro served as the architect of Poland’s highly contested judicial reforms from 2015 to 2023 by merging the positions of Minister of Justice and Prosecutor General. This fusion of roles granted the executive unprecedented control over criminal proceedings and judicial environment, becoming a primary catalyst for the protected “rule of law crisis” that strained relations between Warsaw and the European Union.
The current legal offensive, spearheaded by the new government’s Minister of Justice and Prosecutor General Waldemar Żurek, seeks to hold Ziobro criminally accountable for abuses allegedly committed during his term.
As a Member of Parliament, Ziobro currently benefits from formal parliamentary immunity, which prohibits his criminal liability, detention, or arrest without the prior consent of the Sejm ( the lower house of parliament). The motion to allow prosecutors to press formal charges carrying a potential sentence of up to 25 years. This process is a direct confrontation between the principle of political inviolability and the imperative of state accountability.
Misuse of the Justice Fund and the Pegasus Nexus
The primary focus of the prosecution rests on the alleged criminal mismanagement of the Justice Fund ( Fundusz Sprawiedliwości). Established to assist victims of crime and support crime-prevention initiatives, the fund was administered under the direct authority of the Ministry of Justice, led by Ziobro.
Prosecutors allege that Ziobro established and led an organized criminal group operating within the Ministry. This group is accused of systematically diverting approximately 150
million zlotys ( €35.4 million) from the fund. Evidence suggests these resources were channeled to projects and entities with close ties to Ziobro’s political allies, often under dubious circumstances that violated the fund’s statutory purpose, transforming a victim support mechanism into a tool for political patronage.
Pegasus Scandal: The most politically violated charge involves the use of Justice Fund money to procure the highly intrusive Pegasus spyware from the Israeli NSO group. Ziobro has publicly acknowledged initiating the purchase, though he claims it was for legitimate anti-corruption purposes.
However, subsequent investigations by parliamentary commissions and the prosecutor’s office reveal the system was allegedly deployed to surveil political opponents including figures close to current Prime Minister Donald Tusk, lawyers, and prosecutors critical of the PiS government. This nexus between financial and illegal state surveillance elevates the case from a corruption probe to an investigation into a systemic abuse of state power and violation of civil liberties.
Implications for Democratic Restoration
The decision made by the Sejm on Zbigniew Ziobro’s immunity marks a crucial test of political will and legal capacity in Poland. If immunity is waived, the subsequent criminal proceeding will establish a precedent for the accountability of Poland’s highest officials and could have profound implications for the political landscape.
Ziobro and his political allies have consistently dismissed the proceedings as a “political vendetta” orchestrated by the new government. This counter-narrative challenges the legitimacy of the rule-of-law restoration process itself, framing legal accountability as partisan retribution.
However, the comprehensive nature of the charges, backed by evidence from official documents and testimonies, ground the case firmly in allegations of criminal abuse of public trust and state resources.
Ultimately, the successful prosecution of this case would signal a robust commitment to democratic integrity, demonstrating that Poland’s legal system is capable of holding the most powerful political actors responsible for alleged breaches of law, thereby closing a tumultuous chapter of institutional crisis and reinforcing the separation of powers.
Brussels Morning is a daily online newspaper based in Belgium. BM publishes unique and independent coverage on international and European affairs. With a Europe-wide perspective, BM covers policies and politics of the EU, significant Member State developments, and looks at the international agenda with a European perspective.
