Zalmay Khalilzad, the former U.S. Special Representative for Afghanistan, is considered one of the most influential political and diplomatic figures in the history of Afghanistan’s prolonged conflict and peace efforts. His series of informal visits, political contacts, and negotiations particularly with the Taliban merit close scrutiny by international observers and the Afghan public alike.
Khalilzad has not only played a pivotal role in reinforcing the international legitimacy of the Taliban but has also acted as an intermediary in the private dealings over Afghanistan’s national resources. His activities create a profound tension between Afghanistan’s national aspirations, U.S. foreign policy, and international human rights standards.
This analysis aims to examine Khalilzad’s activities from political, diplomatic, strategic, and economic perspectives, highlighting their impacts on the Afghan population, international organizations, and human rights.
Political and Diplomatic Analysis
Khalilzad’s activities in the political arena have multifaceted implications:
1. Reinforcement of Taliban Legitimacy
Informal visits and negotiations have been employed to enhance the Taliban’s international legitimacy. According to international observers, these efforts have served as an effective instrument to stabilize the Taliban’s political position and expand their external relations, often without prioritizing Afghan human rights or national aspirations.
2. Limitation of Afghan National Aspirations
The collapse of the republic and the continuation of Taliban rule have constrained the realization of the Afghan people’s aspirations. Restrictions on girls’ education, women’s employment, and other fundamental human rights have created significant barriers to public hope and progress.
3. Impacts on U.S. Foreign Policy
Informal political engagements are at odds with U.S. global principles, including democracy and human rights. Khalilzad’s actions undermine international trust in the United States and reveal a disconnect between U.S. values and policy implementation.
4. Political Conflicts and Personal Influence
Khalilzad’s informal ties with the Taliban and Arab investors conflict with official diplomatic protocols. Operating beyond the official framework to enhance Taliban legitimacy and maintain personal influence constitutes a clear example of divergence for international observers.
Strategic Analysis
Khalilzad’s strategic role can be analyzed through several long-term implications:
1. Expansion of Taliban Power and Influence
Informal efforts strengthen the Taliban’s political, economic, and social position, which has direct consequences for regional and international politics.
2. Strategic Threats to National Security
The reinforcement of Taliban legitimacy and power poses a significant threat to Afghanistan’s national security. State structures weaken, and fundamental public rights are compromised.
3. Impact on Regional Dynamics
Agreements between the Taliban and Arab investors are often leveraged to serve regional economic and political interests, sometimes intersecting with personal and financial objectives.
Human Rights and International Norms
Khalilzad’s informal activities have evident consequences for human rights:
1. Restrictions on Women’s Rights
Taliban rule has limited women’s access to education and employment, constituting a direct violation of international human rights.
2. Closure of Girls’ Schools
Informal negotiations have hindered girls’ education, disregarding basic human values.
3. Conflict Between Humanitarian Values and Policy
U.S. foreign policy principles have been subordinated due to Khalilzad’s interventions, weakening the Afghan public’s confidence in human rights protection.
Connections with Terrorist Groups and Arab Investors
Khalilzad’s informal contacts with the Taliban and certain Arab investors have caused several significant challenges:
1. Potential Support for Terrorist Organizations
The legitimacy conferred on the Taliban is linked to the informal acceptance of terrorist activity, creating risks for international security standards.
2. Personal Financial Gains
Agreements with Arab investors appear to serve personal and financial objectives, undermining Afghanistan’s national interests.
3. Lack of Transparency
Informal channels erode trust among Afghans and international observers, highlighting deficiencies in transparency.
Implications for the Afghan People
Khalilzad’s activities have created serious challenges for the Afghan population:
1. Limitation of National Aspirations
The fall of the republic, human rights violations, and educational restrictions have impeded the realization of Afghan national ambitions.
2. Erosion of Trust
Informal U.S. interventions have weakened Afghan trust in international political processes.
3. Economic Harm
Agreements between Arab investors and the Taliban, if motivated by personal gain, obstruct national economic development.
4. Political Instability
Strengthening Taliban legitimacy through external influence undermines Afghanistan’s internal political structure and threatens long-term stability.
According to the Law and Justice civil movement, Khalilzad has leveraged support for the Taliban to facilitate private transactions over Afghanistan’s natural resources. In the 1990s, he served as a consultant for the U.S. company Unocal, overseeing efforts related to the TAPI pipeline project and providing financial support to the Taliban. Unocal is now part of Delta International, and Khalilzad continues to operate as an intermediary within this network. Recently, he met with Taliban senior leader Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar and Delta International CEO Shaher Al-Taqi to discuss gas pipelines and extraction projects. According to Law and Justice, these meetings aim to transfer national resources for private economic gain.
Khalilzad, therefore, functions as an informal diplomat and economic intermediary, simultaneously enhancing Taliban legitimacy and facilitating private control over Afghanistan’s natural resources. His actions reflect a deep contradiction between U.S. values, human rights, and Afghan national aspirations.
Recommendations for International Organizations and the European Union
- Conduct formal investigations and publish transparent reports on Khalilzad and similar activities, assessing potential conflicts of interest and personal financial gains.
- Ensure that any official engagement with Afghanistan explicitly guarantees human rights, particularly women’s right to education and employment.
- Increase financial and political support for civil society, women’s activists, and independent media to prevent aid from bolstering Taliban legitimacy.
- Establish transparency mechanisms and accountability frameworks for agreements with regional investors.
- Prevent the sale of Afghanistan’s natural resources for private or foreign economic gain outside national interests.
A unified, principled, and transparent stance by the European Union can safeguard the long-term rights of the Afghan people and prevent undesirable international dealings.
Dear reader,
Opinions expressed in the op-ed section are solely those of the individual author and do not represent the official stance of our newspaper. We believe in providing a platform for a wide range of voices and perspectives, even those that may challenge or differ from our own. We remain committed to providing our readers with high-quality, fair, and balanced journalism. Thank you for your continued support.
Brussels Morning is a daily online newspaper based in Belgium. BM publishes unique and independent coverage on international and European affairs. With a Europe-wide perspective, BM covers policies and politics of the EU, significant Member State developments, and looks at the international agenda with a European perspective.
