Starmer says Louise Casey to be brought in to support grooming gangs inquiry
Kemi Badenoch starts with a tribute to the former Tory MP Oliver Colvile, who has died.
She says her first question comes from Fiona, one of the grooming gang survivors. Fiona asks what the point of speaking up if you are going to be called liars.
Starmer thanks Badenoch for the question. The grooming gangs scandal was one of the worst of all time. He says his “vow” to Fiona and others is that this inquiry will be different; survivors won’t be ignored. Fiona is welcome to rejoin the panel. The inquiry will not be watered down, it will focus on grooming gangs and it will cover the ethnicity of offenders.
And he says Louise Casey will be brought in to support the inquiry.
Share
Updated at 07.13 EDT
Key events
Show key events only
Please turn on JavaScript to use this feature
Badenoch says Fiona asked what the point is if victims are not being believed. Four victims have resigned from the survivors’ panel. They are right to be worried. It is “shocking” that there is still no chair. The victims don’t want a police officer as chair. They want a judge. Why won’t they get a judge?
Starmer says Louise Casey looked at this. She ruled out a judge-led inquiry for two reasons. First, speed. And, second, Starmer says he wanted prosections to take place. If there were a judge-led inquiry, those prosecutions would have to wait.
On mandatory reporting, he says Badenoch’s comment implies she does not understand who it works.
Share
Badenoch says Labour voted against a national inquiry three times. That is why victims don’t believe them. She says victims think the inquiry will downplay the racial aspect of the attacks.
Starmer says the inquiry will not shy away from cultural or religious issues.
He says Louise Casey recommended a national inquiry.
And he says 1,200 historic cases have been reopened. Mandatory reporting of child sex abuse has been introduced. The Tories voted against that, he says.
Share
Badenoch says Jess Phillips, the safeguarding minister, said claims made by the survivor were wrong. Who is right?
Starmer says he wants survivors to be at the heart of this.
Share
Starmer says Louise Casey to be brought in to support grooming gangs inquiry
Kemi Badenoch starts with a tribute to the former Tory MP Oliver Colvile, who has died.
She says her first question comes from Fiona, one of the grooming gang survivors. Fiona asks what the point of speaking up if you are going to be called liars.
Starmer thanks Badenoch for the question. The grooming gangs scandal was one of the worst of all time. He says his “vow” to Fiona and others is that this inquiry will be different; survivors won’t be ignored. Fiona is welcome to rejoin the panel. The inquiry will not be watered down, it will focus on grooming gangs and it will cover the ethnicity of offenders.
And he says Louise Casey will be brought in to support the inquiry.
Share
Updated at 07.13 EDT
Jayne Kirkham (Lab), the other MP affected by the leak, also asks a different question. She asks about housing in Cornwall.
Share
Roz Savage (Lib Dem) jokes that yesterday there was a serious breach of national security. Her PMQs question was leaked, she says. (See 11.49am.) She says this made her questions if the goverment could be trusted with digital ID.
Starmer defends digital ID, but jokes about it being invisible.
Share
Keir Starmer starts by saying the government unveiled a plan to recruit hundreds of thousands of jobs into green energy. On Monday it announced V-levels, on Tuesday it held a regional investment summit, and today it is announcing measures to clean up rivers.
He also confirmed the govenrment is repealing the presumption of parental involvement in family court hearings.
Share
Independent MP Ayoub Khan suggests Maccabi fans ban revelations imply Nandy misled MPs about it
Today the Guardian’s Vikram Dodd reports that Maccabi Tel Aviv supporters were banned from watching their game against Aston Villa after police intelligence concluded the biggest risk of violence came from extremist fans of the Israeli club.
The independent MP Ayoub Khan, whose Birmingham Perry Barr constituency covers the Villa Park ground where the match was going to take place and who supported the original police decision to ban Maccabi Tel Aviv fans, has retweeted the Guardian story and suggests that it shows Lisa Nandy, the culture secretary, may have lied to MPs on Monday when she criticised the ban, and said it had been imposed in no small part to protect Maccabi fans from antisemitic attacks.
If it transpires that a minister lied & conflated matters in the House of Commons & to British public; I’m afraid it’s not just a resignation from a ministerial post; it’s one where the British public would expect a by-election! And rightly so!
Share
Tim Farron defends Lib Dem MP tipping No 10 off about her PMQs question
Yesterday Steve Back, the photographer who covers Downing Street and who specialises in close up pictures of documents being carried into No 10, took a picture of a file with the wording of two of the questions being prepared for PMQs. One was the first question, from the Lib Dem MP Roz Savage, about the case for more focus on environmental protections in planning rules, and another was the third question, from the Labour MP Jayne Kirkham, about public transport for students in Cornwall.
Back posts on X as PoliticalPics.
Both MPs have been ridiculed on social media for submitting their questions to No 10 in advance. (Following the Back tweet, they may choose to ask something else.)
But in fact it is considered normal – indeed, very sensible – in some circumstances to tell No 10 what you plan to ask, even if you are an opposition MP. Some MPs use PMQs to make party political points. But MPs also raise issues at PMQs in the hope of getting a constructive response from the PM and, if that if your intention, you are much more likely to get a substantive answer if the PM knows what you are going to ask.
This is from Tim Farron, the former Lib Dem leader, responding to a journalist who criticised Savage on this point.
Sorry Jason, this is such complete and utter nonsense. If you get a PMQ as an opposition MP you can try to score points if you like or you can try to ensure you get a decent answer by tipping off the PM in advance. I’ve done both in my time. Literally nothing to see here.
And this is from Peter Heaton-Jones, a former Tory MP.
People trying to make this into a big thing… MPs of all parties give No10 prior notice of PMQs because they want helpful responses on local issues. (Exception is LOTO Qs which are more about the ‘gotcha’). The big mystery is: why are aides still using clear folders?
Share
Starmer faces Badenoch at PMQs
PMQs is starting at noon.
Here is the list of MPs down to ask a question.
PMQs Photograph: HoCShare
Brian Bell, the economics professor who chairs the govenment’s migration advisory committee, has dismissed suggestions that a youth mobility scheme with the EU would help the British economy.
Rachel Reeves has claimed the scheme, which is being negotiated, could provide an economic boost. But, as Politico reports, Bell said it was important not to “over-egg” the economic benefits. He said:
We issue 25,000 youth mobility visas at the moment [to non-EU countries] per year. 35 million people work in the UK. It’s a drop in the ocean.
The UK and the EU agreed in principle to set up a youth mobility scheme at a summit in May. Politico’s Jon Stone has explored what is happening, and his story quotes from what Bell said to a recent UK Business and Trade Commission hearing.
The EU wants a youth mobility scheme with no cap on numbers. The UK says there must be a cap, and the agreeement in May said just said that the overall number of participants must be “acceptable to both sides”.
Bell said that, without a cap, the government would find it impossible to implement the scheme and also stick to its manifesto commitment to reduce overall net migration. He said:
The government would be in breach, very clear breach, of its manifesto commitment to reduce net migration if it agreed to anything like that [a scheme with no cap on numbers].
So I just don’t think that’s possible. I don’t think any political party, or any politician that’s likely to be in power, would agree to that.
Share
Rachel Reeves is delivering her budget five weeks today, and the Times is splashing on the latest hints about what will be in it, saying she is planning “a £2bn tax raid on lawyers, family doctors and accountants as she seeks to balance the books by targeting the wealthy”. It says:
More than 190,000 workers use partnerships, particularly in the legal world, and they offer a significant tax benefit over ordinary employment. They are not subject to employer’s national insurance as partners are treated as self-employed.
Reeves is said to consider this unfair and is expected to announce changes to the system in her budget. She has repeatedly said that “those with the broadest shoulders” should pay their “fair share of tax”, and many of those who use partnerships are high earners.
As Richard Partington and Heather Stewart reported yesterday, this policy has been supported by the Centre for the Analysis of Taxation and the Institute for Fiscal Studies.
Share
Zack Polanski welcomes defection of three councillors from Labour to Green party in Swindon
Zack Polanski, the Green party leader, is in Swindon this morning welcoming the defection of three Labour councillors to his party. They are: Ian Edwards, who defected on Friday, and Tom Butcher and Repi Begum, who are defecting today. They will form the first ever Green group on Swindon council, opposing the Labour administration.
The Greens say party membership in Swindon has risen by more than 60% since Polanski was elected leader in September.
Polanksi said:
Swindon is a political bellwether, and what we’re seeing here is happening across the country: people who believed in Labour’s promise of change now see a party that’s abandoned its principles. They’re turning to the Greens because we’re the only party offering real hope, real courage, and real solutions for the future.
Share
Yesterday the Labour party belatedly put out a statement criticising the Tory frontbencher Katie Lam for saying that many families legally settled in this country should be deported in the interests of turning Britain into “a mostly but not entirely culturally coherent group of people”. But it was quite a weak statement, given the extremism of what Lam was saying.
The Scottish Green MSP Patrick Harvie criticised Labour publicly for not being able to condemn Lam robustly and unequivocally. In public, Labour MPs have not been speaking out. But, in a story for HuffPost UK, Kevin Schofield says that privately Labour figures “have reacted with dismay”. He quotes one Labour MP has saying:
What’s the point of us saying we’re anti-racist when we fail to call out racism? Not only are we cowards but we’re incompetent as well.
Ed Davey, the Lib Dem leader, has now released the text of the letter he has sent to Kemi Badenoch challenging her to disown Lam’s comments.
Share
Grooming survivors say ministers trying to water down inquiry despite reassurances
Grooming gang victims have accused the UK government of attempting to manipulate them into broadening a national inquiry to include other forms of sexual abuse despite Shabana Mahmood’s insistence the focus will not change. Rajeev Syal has the story.
Share
UK inflation unexpectedly remains at 3.8% for third month in a row
UK inflation was unchanged last month at 3.8%, confounding expectations of a rise, in welcome news for the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, as she plans for her crucial budget next month, Heather Stewart reports.
Share
FDA attacks No 10 over briefing undermining Chris Wormald as cabinet secretary less than year after his appointment
Another topic that is likely to come up at PMQs today is a Times report saying that Chris Wormald, the cabinet secretary, who was only appointed in December last year, is expected to be replaced within months.
In July Rowena Mason, the Guardian’s Whitehall editor, revealed that Keir Starmer regretted appointing Wormald. “Multiple sources said some people around Starmer were growing to view the choice of Wormald as “disastrous” for the prospects of radical reform of the civil service and had begun to explore options for how to work around him,” Rowena wrote.
The Times story goes further, saying that Wormald is now expected to be replaced by Louise Casey within months. In their report, Patrick Maguire and Gabriel Pogrund say:
No 10 and Whitehall sources have told The Times that Sir Chris Wormald, the cabinet secretary, is unlikely to survive beyond January as concerns about his performance increase.
Sir Keir Starmer’s inner circle are concerned that the centre of government remains underpowered despite last month’s reorganisation of the prime minister’s Downing Street team.
Starmer’s ally, Baroness Casey of Blackstock, the civil service troubleshooter, is taking an increasingly prominent role and is tipped to replace Wormald.
The report also includes this quote from a “No 10 insider”.
Chris is a parody of every civil service stereotype. He is given clear instructions on an issue and says we will be able to deliver it only after we’ve commissioned a wide-reaching review that reports sometime in the mid-2080s.
Casey has been the go-to choice for prime ministers looking for a no-nonsense, results-focused civil servant problem solver since Tony Blair was in office. Starmer has already asked her to do a grooming gangs audit and to lead a cross-party inquiry into adult social care, which presumably will need a new chair if Casey takes the No 10 job in the new year.
(Presumbly there are at least a few other brilliant fixers in the top ranks of the civil service who could take on some of these jobs. But, given how often No 10 turns to Casey, you could be forgiven for wondering.)
Dave Penman, general secretary of the FDA, the union that represents top civil servants like Wormald, has condemned the briefing against the cabinet secretary. He said:
This is quite the strategy from No. 10. Undermine the Cabinet Secretary you appointed less than 12 months ago and reshuffle the two main ministers with responsibility for the civil service. I can see why you think lack of delivery is everybody else’s fault.
Share
Grooming gangs inquiry will never be watered down, home secretary says, after survivors resign from panel
Good morning. One of the reasons why Shabana Mahmood was appointed home secretary was because, as justice secretary, when the Tories came at her with a “two-tier justice” attack line that was being enthusiastically embraced by the rightwing media, she saw them off swiftly and effectively (essentially, by coopting the argument and responding). Today she is performing a similar rebuttal operation on the grooming gangs inquiry, which is another area where the Daily Mail/GB News etc are on the warpath and the government is floundering.
Here is the Mail’s splash.
Photograph: Daily Mail
‘Chaos’ might be a bit strong, but it’s not wholly unreasonable as a description of what is happening. Keir Starmer announced a national grooming gangs inquiry in June (having previously opposed the idea). Any inquiry like this will only be worth doing if it commands the trust of survivors. The government has not chosen a chair yet, or agreed terms of reference. But it has an oversight panel including around 30 survivors, and over the last three days at least three of them have resigned, complaining about the likely candidates for chair, suggestions that the inquiry will be extended to cover other child abuse, not just grooming gangs, and concerns about the ethnicity of offenders being downplayed. One of two reported candidates for the chair’s post has now pulled out, leaving Jim Gamble, a former police officer and former head the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Command centre as the only person being tipped for the top job. This is problematic because some survivors are opposed to someone with a police background having that role, and the Conservatives are calling for a judge to be put in charge.
To compound the problem, Jess Phillips, the safeguarding minister, told MPs yesterday that claims that the scope of the inquiry might be widened were false. She said:
We are progressing as swiftly as thoroughness allows. Misinformation undermines this process. Allegations of intentional delay, lack of interest and a widening or dilution of the inquiry’s scope are false.
Fiona Goddard, one of the survivors who has left the oversight panel, last night accused Phillips of lying and said she should resign.
All this would be awkward on any day. But it’s PMQs, which means Keir Starmer will be facing Kemi Badenoch, who is personally invested in the grooming gangs story and who believes Starmer only ordered a national inquiry because of Tory pressure on this issue at the start of the year.
And that is where Mahmood comes in. In an article for the Times, she promises that the inquiry will “never be watered down on my watch”. She says:
It was with a heavy heart, in recent days, I learnt that some members have decided to step away from the group. Should they wish to return, the door will always remain open to them. But even if they do not, I owe it to them — and the country — to answer some of the concerns that they have raised.
Firstly, this inquiry is not, and will never be, watered down on my watch. Its scope will not change, and nor will its intent. It will be robust and rigorous. It will direct and oversee local investigations, with the power to compel witnesses and summon evidence.
Secondly, this inquiry will focus on grooming gangs — and that will not change.
Thirdly, it will explicitly examine the ethnicity and religion of the offenders.
She has also written for GB News.
Will this close down the issue ahead of PMQs? Probably not. But, just as with “two-tier justice”, Mahmood has shrunk the space available for the Tories on an issue they thought they could own.
Here is the agenda for the day.
Noon: Keir Starmer faces Kemi Badenoch at PMQs.
After 12.30pm: Angela Rayner is due to make a personal statement to the Commons following her resignation as deputy PM. (According to Politico, it will be a defence of her record, not an attack on the government.)
Afternoon: Starmer hosts summit with leaders from the western Balkans to discuss dealing with illegal migraton.
If you want to contact me, please post a message below the line when comments are open (normally between 10am and 3pm BST at the moment), or message me on social media. I can’t read all the messages BTL, but if you put “Andrew” in a message aimed at me, I am more likely to see it because I search for posts containing that word.
If you want to flag something up urgently, it is best to use social media. You can reach me on Bluesky at @andrewsparrowgdn.bsky.social. The Guardian has given up posting from its official accounts on X, but individual Guardian journalists are there, I still have my account, and if you message me there at @AndrewSparrow, I will see it and respond if necessary.
I find it very helpful when readers point out mistakes, even minor typos. No error is too small to correct. And I find your questions very interesting too. I can’t promise to reply to them all, but I will try to reply to as many as I can, either BTL or sometimes in the blog.
Share
Updated at 04.42 EDT
