Alberta Premier Danielle Smith has declared herself, her political aides and her government vindicated by a former Manitoba judge’s limited investigation of alleged contract irregularities at Alberta Health Services (AHS).
In a statement on the Alberta Government’s website, Smith declared that the report by Raymond Wyant pins the blame entirely on Alberta Health Services (AHS), the province-wide health agency that her government is dismantling as quickly as it can.
“There is no evidence the premier, any minister, political staff member or member of the Alberta Public Service acted improperly in this matter,” her statement crowed.
This is, as Albertans are coming to understand about many of Premier Smith’s statements, not strictly true.
As Wyant, the former chief justice of the Manitoba Provincial Court, himself explained in his report: “It is important to underscore that this investigation was limited in that … it had specific Terms of Reference (TOR) and I have kept most of my comments in this report directed to those TOR. While other topics and potential collateral issues arose during the course of my investigation, I did not have the mandate to pursue those within my investigation.”
He continued:
“Unlike a public inquiry, this investigation did not have the power to subpoena or hear testimony under oath. As a result, people had the opportunity to decline to be interviewed. Some did. Further, because testimony was not under oath, people could decline to answer questions. Some did. Further, because there was not the kind of vigorous examination and cross examination that would take place in a formal setting, I could not come to conclusions on the credibility of information provided verbally by interviewees. In most cases, I perceived, based on my experience, that people were striving to tell the truth and to recall events in as much detail as possible. However, there were occasions where I was left with the impression that might not be the case nor that full and complete information was being provided.”
So based on that, there is no evidence in Wyant’s report, for reasons that the former judge makes clear may not tell the whole story.
Readers are free to exercise your own judgment about whether or not this report really amounts to a vindication of Premier Smith, her aides and her government.
That said, I would be astonished if one or more Postmedia political columnists is not now typing up a screed with the V-word in the lead in order to assist you in reaching the conclusion desired by the government.
They will have material to work with from the premier’s statement.
“Although the judge’s findings clearly indicate that elected officials, senior staff and members of the public service acted appropriately in these matters, I am deeply disappointed with the way these procurements and contracts were dealt with by AHS decision makers and some of its employees,” Smith’s statement reads.
Remember, the allegations that Wyant was hired to investigate were made by former AHS CEO Athana Mentzelopoulos, who was fired by the Smith Government when she tried to launch an internal investigation into what happened. Obviously, this raises certain questions that could not be asked, let alone answered, by Wyant.
Mentzelopoulos’s wrongful dismissal lawsuit continues.
Wyant himself certainly seemed to be concerned about how future readers might interpret his conclusions.“
When I find that there was no wrongful interference by any government official in the matters concerning this report, that only means that I found no evidence of such, but I am not in a position to make a final and absolute determination,” he explained. “I can only make conclusions based on the documents I was able to review and the people I interviewed.” (Emphasis added.)
Under the circumstances, it’s hard to fault him for this concern.
The report includes 18 sensible recommendations including creating whistleblower protection for AHS employees, prohibiting one individual from acting for both AHS and a vendor in the same deal, blocking anyone involved in such a transaction from using their personal email address, and ensuring that all contracts over $10 million are reviewed by a procurement lawyer. The recommendations are found on pages 40-42 of the report.
Premier Smith said in her statement that “I am immediately directing the deputy minister of Executive Council, Dale McFee, to work with all impacted ministries and the new health procurement secretariat to implement judge Wyant’s recommendations as quickly as possible so that future health procurement is done transparently, using best practices.”
Since some of Wyant’s recommendations apply specifically to AHS – which the government is in the process of dismantling – it will be interesting to see if these instructions are interpreted to include the other so-called “pillars” in the UCP’s increasingly fractured public health care system.
Smith’s statement concludes: “This will include the accelerated implementation of the Activity-Based Funding model for surgical services that will see a standard, non-negotiated fee paid to providers for each completed surgery, thereby increasing transparency and more efficient use of taxpayer dollars going forward.”
This sounds like a classic example of never letting a serious crisis go to waste.
This is because the so-called activity-based funding model in effect turns all hospitals into for-profit institutions, an ideological goal of the UCP.
Activity-based funding is commonly used to game the system to ensure that corporate hospitals make more money.
“The incentive is to list all of the diagnoses you can possibly list for every patient, as some of these will increase the payment even if it does not change your management one bit,” warned Prof. Jonathan Ross of the University of Toledo in Ohio in a 2013 article.
It is also likely to result in patients being discharged too early because keeping them in hospital impacts the facility’s bottom line.
Support rabble today!
We’re so glad you stopped by! Thanks for consuming rabble content this year.
rabble.ca is 100% reader and donor funded, so as an avid reader of our content, we hope you will consider gifting rabble with a donation during our summer fundraiser today.
Nick Seebruch, editor
Whether it be a one-time donation or a small monthly contribution, your support is critical to keep rabble writers producing the work you’ve come to rely on as a part of a healthy media diet.
Become a rabble rouser — donate to rabble.ca today.
Nick Seebruch, editor
