HomeInnovationHalted NIH Clinical Trials List Reveals Slashed Treatments for Cancer, COVID and...

Halted NIH Clinical Trials List Reveals Slashed Treatments for Cancer, COVID and Minority Health


November 20, 2025

2 min read

Halted NIH Clinical Trials List Reveals Slashed Treatments for Cancer, COVID and Minority Health

The National Institutes of Health has canceled funding for at least 383 clinical trials in the last year, affecting some 74,000 participants

Mark Wilson/Newsmakers/Getty

Sickle cell disease, sleep disorders and lung cancer: these are just a few of the medical issues that were under investigation in at least 383 clinical trials that have had research grants terminated by the National Institutes of Health since February.

That’s about 1 in 30 of all the clinical trials—tests of medical interventions in human volunteers—funded by the federal agency, which has a $48-billion research budget, according to a JAMA Internal Medicine study published Monday.

The full list of 383 shelved clinical trials cited in the JAMA paper, obtained by Scientific American, reveals a wide range. The cuts follow a Trump administration drive to slash costs and cull funding for studies “misaligned” with its priorities; some 74,000 study participants have been affected by the trial cuts, according to the study.

On supporting science journalism

If you’re enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.

“Trials involving cancer, cardiovascular disease, infectious diseases, mental health conditions, and other major sources of illness were among those affected,” says study co-author Vishal Patel, a physician at Brigham and Women’s Hospital.

“The range of conditions represented in the affected group shows that the impact was not limited to a narrow corner of research. It included areas where many patients face substantial health burdens,” Patel adds.

In a statement, spokesman Andrew Nixon said the Department of Health and Human Services “strongly” rejects the study’s findings.

“NIH currently funds and oversees more than 42,500 active, recruiting or planned clinical trials across every major disease area,” he said.

“Selective focus on a handful of appropriately paused studies does not change that fact, and it should not be used to cast doubt on the overwhelming majority of trials that meet or exceed the gold standard of clinical research,” he said. “We are committed to ensuring that taxpayer dollars support programs rooted in evidence-based practices and gold standard science—not driven by ideological agendas.”

People volunteer to join clinical trials for many reasons, whether out of a desire to help science or to access a new, promising drug. Everyone who participates in a trial exposes themselves to risk, but canceling the trials can also cause harm, says epidemiologist Bruce Psaty of the University of Washington.

“The intrusion of politics into the NIH with such a profound revision of its funding decisions is not among the traditional ethical reasons for stopping clinical trials early,” says Psaty, after reviewing some of the list.

“This intervention not only broke the original promise to participants of contributing to medical knowledge but it also subjected the participants, investigators, and their institutions to potential unanticipated harms,” he says.

Editor’s Note: This story is in development and may be updated.

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can’t-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world’s best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.

There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Must Read

spot_img