How Nigeria’s Bench Became the Quiet Hand of Power
Every nation eventually confronts a moment when its courts must choose between constitutional fidelity and political survival. Nigeria’s judiciary met that moment in the trial of Federal Republic of Nigeria v. Nnamdi Kanu. What should have been a test of evidence became a test of courage. And courage, tragically, was in short supply.
The Federal High Court, presided over by Justice James Kolawole Omotosho, did not simply decide a case; it revealed a system. His courtroom became the looking glass through which Nigerians saw the quiet capture of their judiciary—elegant in speech, disciplined in form, yet docile in spirit. The robes were still black, the wigs still white, but the gavel had turned grey.
Power in the Shadows
The manipulation of justice in Nigeria is rarely loud. It moves through whispers, through budget lines, through administrative reminders that even the most independent judge draws his security and comfort from the Executive he is expected to review. The National Judicial Council’s 2023 report confirmed what many already knew—that financial subordination has become the first instrument of control.
Omotosho’s case illustrates this with unnerving clarity. The courtroom decorum was impeccable, but the proceedings were shaped by invisible caution. Key defense motions were dismissed with sterile efficiency. Applications invoking constitutional protections were deferred or denied under the pretext of “national stability.” The law was read, but its soul was not heard.
This is how capture looks in the twenty-first century. It does not arrive with soldiers at the gates of the courthouse. It arrives with memos, with phone calls, with the unspoken understanding that disobedience carries consequences. Judicial independence, once the bulwark of liberty, has become a ceremonial phrase that even judges recite without conviction.
The Art of Procedural Obedience
Every dictatorship in history has learned to clothe its excesses in the language of procedure. Nigeria’s modern judiciary has mastered that art. In Kanu’s trial, each limitation imposed on the defense was justified procedurally, not politically. Hearings were adjourned on “administrative grounds.” Sensitive materials were withheld for “security reasons.” Defense counsel’s access to evidence was “temporarily restricted.”
Individually, these decisions seemed minor. Collectively, they became architecture—a structure designed not to dispense justice but to control its pace. The International Commission of Jurists’ 2023 report warns that procedural manipulation is now the preferred tool of political influence in fragile democracies. It gives the illusion of legality while draining justice of content.
In this trial, due process was not denied outright; it was hollowed out, one ruling at a time. By the time judgment came, the courtroom had already been stripped of its capacity to deliver fairness.
When Discretion Becomes Doctrine
No one can accuse Justice Omotosho of intemperance. His rulings were calm, his tone judicial, his citations precise. But in law, precision without principle is the most dangerous form of error. The African Bar Association’s 2024 study on judicial restraint defines the danger clearly: “When discretion becomes doctrine, independence dies by civility.”
That is what happened here. By consistently erring on the side of caution, by granting the state the benefit of every procedural doubt, and Omotosho elevated restraint into a governing philosophy. The court no longer acted as guardian of the Constitution but as custodian of public order, a transformation that collapses the entire separation of powers.
The Constitution does not give judges the luxury of timidity. Its Section 6(6)(b) vests them with the full authority to determine the rights of all persons “without fear or favour.” When a judge begins to measure fairness against political convenience, he is no longer interpreting the Constitution; he is revising it.
The Machinery of Subtle Control
Every observer of Nigeria’s judiciary understands that corruption is not always financial. Sometimes it is psychological. A judge who fears transfer, isolation, or delayed promotion can be controlled without ever being bribed. This is what the CLEEN Foundation’s 2022 survey called “institutional intimidation”—a quiet system of reward and reprisal that rewards compliance and punishes principle.
Omotosho’s trial reflected that ecosystem. There were no reports of overt coercion; there didn’t need to be. The structure itself disciplines dissent. A judge who displeases the establishment risks career stagnation, while one who follows the wind of political sentiment enjoys swift elevation. The message is simple: in the architecture of Nigerian justice, independence is a liability.
The Disappearing Public Trust
The deeper tragedy lies not in the courtroom but in the street. When citizens begin to believe that justice is predetermined, the social contract unravels. The Transparency International 2023 Judicial Integrity Index recorded a sharp drop in Nigerians’ trust in the judiciary—from 45% in 2019 to 28% in 2023. The decline is not about incompetence; it is about credibility. People no longer see courts as the last hope of the common man, but as the final seal of political design.
In this trial, every symbolic act of independence was undercut by practical submission. The language of the judgment invoked constitutional principles, but the logic served political stability. In the eyes of the public, the bench appeared captured, the verdict choreographed, the process sterilized.
The Rule of Law and Accountability Advocacy Centre’s 2023 field study described it aptly: “A judiciary that confuses neutrality with silence ends up enabling the very injustice it was created to prevent.” Omotosho’s courtroom proved that silence is not neutrality; it is complicity.
Power’s Reflection in the Gavel
The political dimensions of this case cannot be divorced from Nigeria’s historical habit of using courts as instruments of containment. From Ken Saro-Wiwa to Omoyele Sowore, the judiciary has often been the middleman between executive will and popular dissent. In each instance, legality became the language through which repression was explained.
Omotosho’s rulings did not need to be overtly biased; they simply needed to follow the established rhythm. Every delay, every rejection of defense evidence, every invocation of “national security” harmonized perfectly with the government’s narrative. The law was no longer adversarial, it was performative.
As Human Rights Watch’s 2024 report observed, Nigerian courts have developed “a habit of procedural alignment,” where judicial outcomes reflect the tone of political anxiety rather than the content of constitutional duty. This alignment, once normalized, becomes systemic. The next judge inherits not precedent but pattern.
The Law That Looked Away
When power enters the courtroom, justice often leaves quietly. The tragedy is that it leaves wearing a smile. Omotosho’s conduct throughout the trial displayed restraint, patience, and civility—virtues that, in their excess, became vices. Justice must be dispassionate, not detached. By refusing to challenge overreach, the court turned neutrality into abdication.
The Nigerian Bar Association’s 2024 statement on judicial independence warns that “a judiciary that fears consequence cannot uphold conscience.” That warning is now prophecy fulfilled. Every judgment rendered under intimidation is a quiet death for constitutional democracy. Every trial decided under pressure teaches future judges that loyalty is safer than integrity.
The Verdict of the Public Conscience
When history examines this period, it will not recall the decorum of the courtroom but the timidity of the bench. Justice Omotosho may have followed procedure, but he abandoned purpose. His judgment did not vindicate the law—it vindicated fear.
The Human Rights Watch 2024 analysis concluded that “the Nigerian judiciary has perfected the art of lawful injustice.” The phrase is brutally apt. Omotosho’s trial was not lawless; it was law in its most obedient form, carefully dressed to serve its master.
In the grand theatre of Nigeria’s constitutional evolution, this judgment will stand as a cautionary tale. It showed that democracy dies not when courts defy power, but when they learn to imitate it.
Verdict
Justice James Kolawole Omotosho did not lose control of his court—he surrendered it. His rulings were framed in civility, couched in citations, and polished with judicial restraint, yet they collectively betrayed the Constitution he swore to defend. The gavel became an echo chamber of political convenience, not a shield of liberty.
When power spoke, law listened. And in that silence, justice; once proud, once fearless, became a well-dressed captive of the state.
History will not forgive that choice.
Professor MarkAnthony Ujunwa Nze is an acclaimed investigative journalist, public intellectual, and global governance analyst whose work shapes contemporary thinking at the intersection of health and social care management, media, law, and policy. Renowned for his incisive commentary and structural insight, he brings rigorous scholarship to questions of justice, power, and institutional integrity.
Based in New York, he serves as a full tenured professor and Academic Director at the New York Center for Advanced Research (NYCAR), where he leads high-impact research in governance innovation, strategic leadership, and geopolitical risk. He also oversees NYCAR’s free Health & Social Care professional certification programs, accessible worldwide at:
👉 https://www.newyorkresearch.org/professional-certification/
Professor Nze remains a defining voice in advancing ethical leadership and democratic accountability across global systems.
African Bar Association. (2024). Judicial independence and political interference in Africa: The Nigerian dilemma. Lagos, Nigeria: AfBA Centre for Constitutional Governance.
Amnesty International Nigeria. (2024). Nigeria: Courts under pressure – Political trials and the shrinking civic space. Abuja, Nigeria: Amnesty International.
BudgIT Foundation. (2025). State of States Report 2025 – Governance, justice and accountability (Nigeria chapter). Lagos, Nigeria: BudgIT Foundation.
Centre for Democracy and Development (CDD West Africa). (2023). Executive influence and the rule of law in Nigeria’s Fourth Republic. Abuja, Nigeria: CDD Publications.
CLEEN Foundation. (2022). Separation of powers and judicial ethics in Nigeria’s democracy. Lagos, Nigeria: CLEEN Foundation Press.
Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (1999, as amended). (2023 rev. ed.). Abuja, Nigeria: Federal Government Printer.
Federal Ministry of Justice. (2021). Annual justice sector reform report 2021: Independence, integrity and performance of the bench. Abuja, Nigeria: Justice Sector Coordination Office.
Human Rights Watch. (2024). Nigeria: Justice captured – The judiciary and political accountability crisis. New York, NY: Human Rights Watch.
International Commission of Jurists (Africa Regional Programme). (2023). The politics of prosecution: Fair-trial guarantees and executive overreach in West Africa. Pretoria, South Africa: ICJ Africa.
National Judicial Council (NJC). (2023). Annual report on discipline and judicial independence 2023. Abuja, Nigeria: NJC Secretariat.
Nigerian Bar Association (NBA). (2024). Statement on threats to judicial independence and fair hearing in high-profile political cases. Abuja, Nigeria: NBA National Secretariat.
Open Society Justice Initiative. (2020). Capturing the courts: The use of political power to shape judicial outcomes in Nigeria. New York, NY: Open Society Foundations.
Premium Times Nigeria. (2025, November 21). From Mohammed to Omotosho: The four judges who handled Kanu’s case. Retrieved from https://www.premiumtimesng.com
Rule of Law and Accountability Advocacy Centre (RULAAC). (2023). Executive pressure on the bench: An empirical assessment of Nigeria’s federal courts. Lagos, Nigeria: RULAAC Publications.
Transparency International Nigeria. (2023). Judicial transparency and integrity index – Nigeria report 2023. Abuja, Nigeria: TI-Nigeria Secretariat.
Africa Today News, New York
